Thursday, August 31, 2017

Identity Politics Are Tearing America Apart - Note for a discussion, "E Pluribus Unum? What Keeps the United States United."


Wall Street Journal

PHOTO: GETTY IMAGES/ISTOCKPHOTO
Somehow, the drumbeat of dissonance seems harsher today. America’s national ideal of “e pluribus unum”—out of many, one—threatens to become a hollow slogan. Jaded Americans are constantly confronted by a deluge of animus from their televisions and smartphones. The U.S. finds itself increasingly divided [JB emphasis] along lines of race, ethnicity, gender, religion and sexual identity. 

Countless demagogues stand ready to exploit those differences. When a sports reporter of Asian heritage is removed from his assignment because his name is close to that of a Confederate army general, political correctness has gone too far. Identity politics practiced by both major political parties is eroding a core principle that Americans are, first and foremost, Americans.
The divisions in society are real. So are national legacies of injustice. All can and must be addressed. Those who preach hatred should be called out for their odious beliefs. But even as extremism is condemned, Americans of good will need to keep up lines of civil, constructive conversation. 

–– ADVERTISEMENT ––
The country faces a stark choice. Its citizens can continue screaming at each other, sometimes over largely symbolic issues. Or they can again do what the citizens of this country have done best in the past—work together on the real problems that confront everyone.

Both of us have been at the center of heated disputes in this country and around the world. And there’s one thing we’ve learned over the decades: You achieve peace by talking, not yelling. The best way to resolve an argument is to find common ground.
We encourage Congress and the White House to take this approach in the fall. First, they should raise the debt ceiling and fund the government. There is no benefit to shutting down the government simply because one side does not get all it wants from the legislative process. A government shutdown would only fortify most people’s dissatisfaction with a federal government they (often correctly) believe doesn’t work for them. And it would only breed more debilitating cynicism.
We hope that leaders in Washington will also focus on infrastructure projects that can help the U.S. keep pace with its global competitors, particularly China. Floodwaters don’t distinguish between Republicans and Democrats. Nor do rotting bridges discriminate between whites and blacks. This is an important and easy area to emphasize common interests. Political leaders should prioritize and provide tangible policies that benefit Americans. They are long overdue.
We also encourage Washington to focus with laserlike intensity on the federal tax code, which handcuffs American businesses. This country needs to find politically palatable ways to streamline that code and bring corporate taxes in line with those of other countries. As a way to protect the debate from becoming a battle over whose ox gets gored, Congress should make any tax reform revenue-neutral. Legislation should also encourage investors to bring their money back into the U.S., where it can be put into civic projects that improve America.
Congress and the president must do more than just act on these pressing issues. They also need to set an example to all Americans. We understand that politics is a contact sport, but leaders in Washington need to restrain their rhetoric and practice the lost art of compromise. They should stop pandering to the worst in us and appeal instead to what President Lincoln called “the better angels of our nature.”
Alexis de Tocqueville [JB - see], the 19th-century French diplomat who identified strengths in the American experiment, admired the resiliency of the system the Founding Fathers devised. He wrote in the first volume of “Democracy in America” that “the greatness of America lies not in being more enlightened than any other nation, but rather in her ability to repair her faults.”
America has many faults that must be repaired—from a failed health-care system to a military that needs upgrading. Americans must, as Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. said during a 1965 commencement address for Oberlin College, learn to live together as brothers and sisters. Or, we will perish together as fools. We are convinced that the vast majority of Americans would like leaders in Washington to remember King’s advice when they return to work after Labor Day.
Mr. Baker served as U.S. secretary of the Treasury (1985-88) and state (1989-92). Mr. Young served as U.S. ambassador to the United Nations (1977-79) and mayor of Atlanta (1982-90).
Appeared in the August 31, 2017, print edition.

Wednesday, August 30, 2017

Which Statues Need to Come Down? You Decide


via email from the NYT (hey, it's free "content"! :) - JB)

[JB comment: Donald Trump need not worry about his standing in history. It is highly dubious that any kind of statue/memorial will be constructed in his honor -- except, possibly, a wall between TrumpmakeAmerikagreatagainfantasyland ... tweettweettweet and the United States's southern neighbor and essential trading/cultural partner, Mexico.]



Confederate general Robert E. Lee has been a clear target of protesters who want to take down monuments linked to America’s history of white supremacy. Christopher Columbus has a more ambiguous legacy.
How do we assess the contributions of — and memorials to — people who did great things, but terrible ones, too? Is there a difference between famous men guilty of injustice and those whose fame was inseparable from it?
Here are some of the men and monuments that have come up for debate. In some cases it's entire careers being reconsidered, while in others it's the specific statue, or its location, that has drawn criticism. It's not easy to draw the line between what should remain and what should come down, but help us out.
1 of 16

Christopher Columbus, explorer (1451-1506)

He was among the first European explorers to reach the Americas. Critics point to his role igniting the colonization of America, the spread of deadly European diseases and the start of the transatlantic slave trade.














The Christopher Columbus statue in Columbus Circle in New York City, where a 90-day review of “symbols of hate” is underway. Spencer Platt/Getty Images

Take it down?
Yes.
No.
2 of 16

Ulysses S. Grant, general and U.S. president (1822-1885)

Led the Union Army in the Civil War. He has been accused of anti-Semitism over a Civil War-era order, for which he later repented, expelling “Jews and other unprincipled traders” from parts of the South.














The General Grant Memorial Monument, aka Grant’s Tomb, in New York. Kathy Willens/Associated Press

Take it down?
Yes.
No.
3 of 16

Joe Paterno, college football coach (1926-2012)

The highly successful longtime head coach of Penn State's football team. He was tarnished by a child sex abuse scandal involving a member of his coaching staff. His statue was taken down as a result in 2012, but former players have also asked to restore it.














Concealing a statue of Joe Paterno in State College, Pa., before its removal in 2012. John Beale/Associated Press

Was it right to take it down?
Yes.
No.
4 of 16

Frank Rizzo, Philadelphia mayor and police commissioner (1920-1991)

A charismatic, tough-talking politician and self-made man. His aggressive police tactics and law-and-order politics antagonized Philadelphia’s black community.














Frank Rizzo was a mayor and police commissioner in Philadelphia, where his statue stands. Matt Rourke/Associated Press

Take it down?
Yes.
No.
5 of 16

Robert E. Lee, Confederate general (1807-1870)

Led the Confederate Army during the Civil War. A slaveholder, he symbolizes to many the white supremacy and institution of slavery the South sought to defend.














There are many statues of Lee in the South. This one is in Richmond, Va. Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images

Take it down?
Yes.
No.
6 of 16

Nathan Bedford Forrest, Confederate general (1821-1877)

On the battlefield, he was considered a great tactician. A slaveholder and slave trader before the war, Forrest became an early member of the KKK after it ended.














Karen Pulfer Focht/Reuters

Take it down?
Yes.
No.
7 of 16

Jefferson Davis, president of the Confederacy (1808-1889)

Davis was a U.S. representative and a senator before the Civil War. Opponents say his legacy, like those of Robert E. Lee and Nathan Bedford Forrest, is inseparable from the institution of slavery.














This monument to Jefferson Davis stands in Richmond, Va. Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images

Take it down?
Yes.
No.
8 of 16

Theodore Roosevelt, U.S. president (1858-1919)

He helped establish the U.S. as a world power and was an early proponent of conservation. Indigenous activists and artists have called an equestrian statue of him flanked by an African and a Native American a “stark embodiment of the white supremacy that Roosevelt himself espoused and promoted.”














The statue of Theodore Roosevelt outside the American Museum of Natural History in New York. Brian Shumway for The New York Times

Take it down?
Yes.
No.
9 of 16

George Washington, founding father, first U.S. president (1732-1799)

Commander of the Continental Army and a towering figure in American history. As President Trump has pointed out, he owned slaves, too.














A monument to George Washington in the Capitol Rotunda in Washington, D.C. Michael Reynolds/European Pressphoto Agency

Take it down?
Yes.
No.
10 of 16

Andrew Jackson, U.S. president (1767-1845)

War hero and seventh U.S. president. Jackson was also a slaveholder and infamous for his role in the forced relocation of Native American tribes living east of the Mississippi.














One statue of Andrew Jackson stands in Lafayette Square in Washington, D.C. Daniel Slim/Agence France-Presse — Getty Images

Take it down?
Yes.
No.
11 of 16

J. Marion Sims, pioneering doctor (1813-1883)

Considered the “father of modern gynecology,” he pioneered surgical techniques for major complications in childbirth. Sims experimented on slave women in developing his advances.














A statue of J. Marion Sims in New York. Spencer Platt/Getty Images

Take it down?
Yes.
No.
12 of 16

Roger B. Taney, Chief Justice of the Supreme Court (1777-1864)

Also a U.S. attorney general and secretary of the treasury before joining the Supreme Court, he is remembered for writing the 1857 Dred Scott decision ruling that blacks could never be American citizens. Legal scholars consider that decision to be one of the worst in the court's history.














The statue of Roger B. Taney being removed from outside the Maryland State House in Annapolis this month. Jose Luis Magana/Associated Press

Was it right to take it down?
Yes.
No.
13 of 16

‘Silent Sam,’ Confederate soldier

This statue on the University of North Carolina campus in Chapel Hill is one of many throughout the South that memorialize not Civil War generals, but the anonymous individual men who also fought and died. Critics say such statues perpetuate the “Lost Cause” revisionist history of the Civil War that argues that Southerners sought to defend their homes and way of life from Northern aggression.














A Confederate monument on the campus of UNC-Chapel Hill, under guard. Sara D. Davis/Getty Images

Take it down?
Yes.
No.
14 of 16

Stephen Foster, songwriter (1826-1864)

Among Foster’s most famous songs are “Oh! Sussana,” “My Old Kentucky Home” and “Camptown Races.” Critics object to a memorial near the campus of the University of Pittsburgh that portrays Foster with a strumming slave sitting at his feet.














The statue of Stephen Foster has been criticized for the depiction of a slave at his feet. Associated Press Photo

Take it down?
Yes.
No.
15 of 16

Strom Thurmond, U.S. senator (1902-2003)

A long-serving U.S. senator from South Carolina. A staunch supporter of segregation until the 1970s, Thurmond secretly fathered a child with a black woman.














The coffin of Strom Thurmond, being carried out of the South Carolina Statehouse and past his statue in 2003. Ellen Ozier/Reuters

Take it down?
Yes.
No.
16 of 16

William McKinley, U.S. president (1843-1901)

McKinley was the 25th president of the United States, assassinated shortly into his second term. During his tenure, the U.S. took control of Puerto Rico, Guam and the Philippines as a result of the Spanish-American War and strengthened its grip on the Hawaiian islands. Native Hawaiians at the time considered the move illegal, and protesters in the state today view McKinley as a symbol of imperialism.














A statue of William McKinley in front of McKinley High School in Honolulu. Craig T. Kojima/The Star-Advertiser, via Associated Press

Take it down?
Yes.
No.

Here’s the percentage of readers who supported taking each statue down

  • 93%Nathan Bedford Forrest
  • 84%Jefferson Davis
  • 83%Joe Paterno
  • 83%Roger B. Taney
  • 79%Robert E. Lee
  • 70%Strom Thurmond
  • 57%Frank Rizzo
  • 53%J. Marion Sims
  • 53%'Silent Sam'
  • 48%Stephen Foster
  • 42%Andrew Jackson
  • 31%Christopher Columbus
  • 24%William McKinley
  • 17%Theodore Roosevelt
  • 8%Ulysses S. Grant
  • 4%George Washington
Based on 21239 reader responses.